World of Warcraft “Item Squish”

The lead system designer for World of Warcraft, Greg Street, posted an article about a proposed “item squish”. The Item Squish, he argues, is necessary because stats on items will at some point become meaningless – and illustrates this with hypothetical items from the endgame of Mists of Panderia and whatever expansion would follow that.

That World of Warcraft would at some point get problems with the constant inflation isn’t new; I recall discussing this with some buddies of mine back when Burning Crusade came out. It’s also been a problem in the economy, but unlike say Eve Online, WoW’s economy isn’t really an integral part of the game.

I do think that this kind of shows that Blizzard did not originally think about power levels much, and didn’t quite anticipate how long WoW would be popular. Or perhaps they simply chose to ignore the problem at first. With a power progression as implemented, I am sure they knew they would run into trouble eventually, they are way too good at what they do not to. Had they taken a long term view, they would be scaling their gear accordingly. When Arjan and I build Underdark Adventures 3, one of the very early things I did was set up rules on gear design, and set the general levels of power items for characters level 1…30 would have. It worked really well, too; game imbalance existed but mostly because of the way some of Neverwinter Nights spells worked. The items were never an issue.

Anyway, Greg’s is a good lesson to anybody who has to balance a game of any kind.

Task Resolution

After deciding that 3d6 is a dice mechanic that gives good, generally predictable results and a good granularity, let’s work on task resolution. “Task resolution” is any situation where a character is attempting to achieve something, but the mechanics will be used for other decisions as well. One example might be random encounters, where the probability is dependent on, say, weather or the time of the day.
Continue reading “Task Resolution” »

Dice and Probabilities

If I wanted to create a game system, one of the first things I’d tackle is the fundamental dice mechanic I’d like to use. Rolling dice, and the chances a player is supposed to have at succeeding different given tasks, obviously deeply influence many other design decisions – such fundamentals as attribute ranges and how they figure into the dice rolls, but all other aspects of the game system as well.

Continue reading “Dice and Probabilities” »

Alternate Reality Games

I’ve recently gotten involved in a “new” type of game: The Alternate Reality Game. New, in that it’s still fairly niche. ARGs have existed for a while and are slowly gaining in popularity. I heard about them some years ago but never actually participated, and that’s changing now (well, within the limits that my time allows for).

An ARG is basically a mixture between a puzzle game and a scavenger hunt. The organizers – the so-called “Puppet masters” – invent a plot and leave a trail of clues and riddles for the players to unravel. By its nature, these games are “viral”, and players organize themselves on forums etc to work on the clues and riddles together. The ARG is used a lot as a viral marketing tool, most famously a campaign run for the Cloverfield move. Another was the “I love Bees” campaign to promote Halo 2.

ARGs are not the same as viral marketing, however. Alternate Reality Games do not try to trick consumers into believing a falsehood. While the ARG pretend that they are not games – “This Is Not A Game” is the ARG mantra and part of their design aesthetic – it will acknowledge its artificial and fictional nature, usually by using obviously fictitious elements. An Alternate Reality Game has more in common with Live Action Role Playing Games, except there is no set rules system, and people do not have to meet, dress up, etc. Also, where the Game Masters are quite obviously present in LARPs, they are hidden behind “The Curtain” in an Alternate Reality Game.

What makes an ARG so interesting, to me, is that they weave an interactive story to a possibly fairly large audience, limited pretty much only by how much money and effort is put in. They seem to be an excellent method to build a community. ARGs are fairly intense experiences, and even when they reach a smaller target audience, this audience has a much more intimate contact with the material in the game.

Links to get you started on Alternate Reality Games:

  • ARGNet – news source for ARGs
  • Unfiction – Community site for ARG players and organizers

I would love to run an ARG some day, though my location in Germany and the fact that I am not a native speaker are hindrances. The ARG scene in Germany seems to be very limited.

Planetary System Creation – WIP 1

I spent a lot of time today to put my planetary system generation rules through a first test. My rules set isn’t very original, it’s basically a compilation of other systems. Yeah – I wish I could create my very own, but I am simply no astrophysicist and I do not have the time to read a dozen books and interview experts.

I don’t need something hyper-realistic anyway, with any luck my solar systems will be superseded by real science anyway when we find out the composition of nearby star systems. I need something that is plausible – “playable realism”, so to speak.

My test case was Alpha Centauri. At first, I did a lot by hand, but then I decided that I might as well build a nice spreadsheet and use only that – since I will eventually have to design hundreds of solar systems I really do not want to do any manual calculations and ideally no manual table lookups at all.

Boy, is creating formulas in OpenOffice a hassle – you have to enter it all on one line!

But it was worth it. My current spreadsheet takes some basic values about the star, and a lot of dice-rolling (I wanted this manual, even if OpenOffice can do random values – I didn’t check for that – because this way I can fudge values when necessary). It produces orbits, world types, diameters, atmosphere and world types, and a few other derived values. It’s not quite complete but it’s an awesome start!

I didn’t do Alpha Centauri B yet – nor Proxima, for that matter – but Alpha Centauri A will have two habitable worlds; one true Garden world and one Glacier world on the outer edge of the Habitable Zone.

And yes, I fudged the results. When I read up on what we know about the real Alpha Centauri system, I found out that we failed to detect any gas giant worlds there.

So this will be my method when I start working on my solar systems – fudge results so I match roughly what we know to be true for real, and make sure the rest works for the fictional universe I am setting up.

Ruins & Adventures – The Last Doodle

Well this is the last one. I swear.

Original photo: Fort du Lomont : couloir à l’arrière des chambrées du premier étage du réduit (HDR), by Bresson Thomas.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-10.jpg

Ruins & Adventures – Three More Mockups

More doodling.

Original photo for the last mock-up: Eilean Donan Castle in Scotland by Shadowgate, cc-by licensed

Ruins & Adventures – Quick Mockups

Just doodling.

Ruins & Adventures: Mock-up 1

Ruins & Adventures: Mock-up 1

Original art: Ruines du château de Saint-Cloud, Public Domain.

Ruins & Adventures: Mock-up 2

Ruins & Adventures: Mock-up 2

Original art: Ruin walls on the Rhine, Public Domain

 

 

The Price of Flying

World of Warcraft, still the dominant MMORPG, lets players purchase mounts – riding animals like horses and so on – in order to speed up travel across its virtual world. As such, they are a greatly appreciated convenience. With Burning Crusade, the first expansion to the game, Blizzard added an improvement over the classic mounts: Flying mounts. Since the world featured in The Burning Crusade, the Outlands, is a ragged, torn-apart world with many mountains, valleys, and even outright gaps between areas, this addition made perfect sense. Flying mounts were also usable in the second expansion’s new continent, Northrend (with the purchase of an additional skill at a higher level). And since you can’t take something like this away from players again, Flying is going to be available all over Azeroth with the next expansion, Cataclysm.

One of the many flying mounts in World of Warcraft

There’s no question that using these flying mounts makes travel much faster, much more convenient, and lets one progress through the game much faster. In the old days, you had to travel to wherever your quest took you, often fighting unrelated enemies on the way, and now you can swoop in on the back of your griffin, complete your quest, and fly again on out and into the sunset.

But there’s also a price for this convenience. And it’s actually one that is much higher than most people realize.

These days, there’s the Midsummer festival in Azeroth, and with it came a lot of festival specific quests. As I was completing them with my mage, I kept coming across other high level players in places that are usually completely deserted. In one case we even grouped up for mutual defense against our enemies, the Horde, and at the end I teleported everybody to a safe city.

Memories came back to me, of my early characters. When I had to ride through the same landscapes to complete quests. Back then, I’d meet many people, and oftentimes, we’d join forces to complete the quests, role-playing and chatting along the way.

Once flying mounts become available, though, what would have happened is the same thing that happens in Outlands and Northrend now: People swoop in, take their quest objective, and leave again. They have a much smaller chance to meet each other, and even when they do see each other, they never form groups, except for the hardest of quests – and in those cases, it’s not usually by chance, but by out of character chat.

So the price of flying mounts is reduced interaction, reduced socializing, and reduced role-playing. I know some people couldn’t care less, but personally I think this is sad. Not only does it take away opportunities to meet new people, it also lessens the immersion in the game world.

Naturally this does not mean that Blizzard should remove the flying mounts, or even limit them. It’s too late for that anyway. But I know if I were to ever design an MMO, I’d think long and hard about adding such freedom of movement – and err on the side of caution.

Richard Bartle on MMO design paradigms

Richard Bartlethe man when it comes to MMO design – held a very interesting talk at IMGDC. In it he’s discussing the different types of MMO designs, and how “social” mmo’s contrast with the linear World-of-Warcraft design and the more freeform games like Eve Online. His talk is definitely worth a read, I just wish there was a recording.

The PDF is here.